Medical bills are a common category of damages in a personal injury case. It is widely accepted that if a business causes injury to a person, that business should at minimum be liable for paying all medical bills stemming from the injury.
But medical bills can create some interesting questions in a lawsuit brought by a construction worker for personal injuries. What happens if a health insurance company has already paid for the injured worker’s medical bills? Can the worker sue the construction company for the medical bills anyway? If so, wouldn’t that result in the worker getting reimbursed twice for the same bills? If not, shouldn’t the construction company have to pay for the harm it causes?
This article discusses the effects of health insurance on a construction worker’s personal injury lawsuit.
Can a Worker Sue a Construction Company for Medical Bills That Were Already Paid by Insurance?
In short, the answer is yes, but the worker probably isn’t going to end up with the money. To illustrate how this works, consider the example of a hypothetical construction worker named Jim:
Jim suffers injuries at work when he is struck by an earth mover being operated by another worker. Jim, who has health insurance, goes to the hospital. Along with numerous minor injuries, Jim’s right shoulder is badly hurt, requiring surgery. Over the course of several months, doctors perform surgery and Jim regularly sees a physical therapist to strengthen the repaired shoulder. After deductibles, Jim’s health insurance pays for all of the treatment, which totals $50,000.
Jim hires an attorney and files a lawsuit against a construction company involved in the project. Jim’s health insurance company files a lien against the lawsuit. By filing the lien, the health insurance company is arguing, in essence, “Jim is the one who was injured, so it is his prerogative to sue. But Jim did not pay for the medical care he received for his shoulder, the insurance company did. So, if he receives reimbursement for the medical care that was provided, that money should go to his insurance company, not directly to him.”
In most states, the health insurance company’s lien would be valid. Let’s assume that Jim recovers $100,000 in his lawsuit for medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering. $50,000 would go to the health insurance company (to satisfy the lien) and the rest would go to Jim (and his lawyer).
Implications of this System
The system makes some sense. Assuming the construction company was negligent, it caused at least $50,000 worth of harm (in Jim’s case). Jim’s health care provider paid for that $50,000. So, the construction company should reimburse the health insurance company for the $50,000 expense. Right?
Consider a few additional things. Health insurance is basically a way for people to pay for health care costs in advance. Jim has done that by paying his premiums. So, perhaps Jim has a better claim to the reimbursement than a cursory analysis might reveal. Yes, the health insurance company covered the $50,000 cost. But it only did so after collecting premiums from Jim for several years. Didn’t Jim really pay the cost of his medical care by paying those premiums in advance? If that is the case, it seems that Jim should get the $50,000.
On the other hand, when health insurance companies determine prices for the plans that they offer, they consider issues including whether they will be able to obtain reimbursement in the event of an injury like Jim’s. So, if the law were different, and the $50,000 went to Jim, the insurance company may have been forced to charge higher premiums all along.
But with the system the way that it is, consider Jim’s incentive to sue the construction company. A lawsuit can be a difficult process. There are costs and fees (such as filing fees) required just to file a lawsuit. So, a plaintiff needs an incentive (a decent potential pot of money) to file a lawsuit.
Let’s look at Jim’s case again. He had a great result. He won $100,000 (probably about the most he could have expected in his case). So, that is plenty of an incentive, right? Well, assuming Jim had an attorney, he probably agreed to a contingency fee of about 33%. In many (but not all) states, an attorney’s fee takes priority over a health care lien. So, the attorney might be able to take $33,333. The health insurance company might still be able to take $50,000. So, Jim could be left with only $16,667. And this was the ideal result for Jim. He could have lost the lawsuit. He could have received a smaller award.
So, one of the problems with health care liens in injury cases is that they can reduce an injured person’s incentive to file a lawsuit. Jim is responsible for filing this lawsuit because he is the one who was injured. But look who benefits most: the insurance company. So, perhaps it would make more sense for the insurance company to have the obligation to hire the attorney and pursue the lawsuit. In any case, this is how the system works, so keep that in mind when it comes to your lawsuit over a construction injury.