Enter Your Zip Code to Connect with a Lawyer Serving Your Area
When one person suffers harm at the hands of another individual, company or entity, they can usually collect damages from the responsible party. There are two ways to do this: the injured victim may be offered and accept a settlement outside of court, or they may need to go through with a civil lawsuit in order to collect damages. While a civil lawsuit might occasionally net the plaintiff more money than an out of court settlement, the vast majority of personal injury cases settle well before a jury is sent to deliberate. There are many reasons for this.
Settlement occurs when a potential (or actual) defendant makes an offer of payment to an injured victim or potential plaintiff.
1. The offer of settlement may be made before any lawsuit has ever been filed, after a potential claim arises.
2. It may be made after a case has gone to trial and a trial has begun, as long as no final verdict has come back.
3. Some settlements are made once a jury is deliberating, since one or
both parties might become nervous as the jury debates their fate and
decide that they prefer the sure thing of a settlement.
When a defendant makes an offer to a plaintiff of a settlement, the plaintiff must relinquish any and all potential future claims against the defendant arising out of the accident or incident. The plaintiff does this by signing a full liability release. For example, in a car accident case, the car insurer may offer the plaintiff $50,000 to settle the case. The plaintiff, to receive that $50,000, would have to agree not to sue as a result of the car accident.
Settlements are almost always offered when insurance companies are involved in a case, which happens in the vast majority of personal injury cases. The reason that an insurer is almost always involved is because most people and companies buy insurance to protect themselves from areas of potential liability. For example:
The fact that so many personal injury cases do involve insurance companies goes a long way towards explaining why so many cases settle; insurers have the money to pay out claims, expect to pay out some claims, and are risk averse and don't want to end up with no control over costs when they have to go to trial, pay legal fees and deal with a jury.
An insurer that refuses a reasonable settlement offer that is within the policy limits may become responsible for an entire court verdict, even the part that is over the policy limits, in certain instances. This doesn't mean settlements always come from insurance companies. A company that is sued, even if it doesn't have liability insurance, may choose to settle as well, as may an individual.
The fact that so many cases settle, especially when insurance companies are involved, naturally leads to the question of why? Why is it better for a plaintiff to settle, and why is it better for a defendant to settle? There are many reasons, including:
If the defendant knows he is going to be held responsible, he might not want the case to get in front of a sympathetic jury that could award large pain and suffering or punitive damage awards for the plaintiff. Instead, the defendant or insurer may prefer a settlement where it has control over how much to offer.
This is important for some companies especially. For example, if a company produces a defective product and only a few people are injured by it, the company may want to try to arrange a quiet out of court settlement and avoid major publicity that might accompany a trial. When a settlement agreement is drafted, it gives a company (or any defendant for that matter) the opportunity to negotiate terms of that agreement that work for everyone. This can include a requirement of confidentiality.
Trials can extend for months, or even for years if there are appeals. A plaintiff who needs income and has medical expenses may not want to wait that long to get financial relief. A plaintiff also may not feel up to going through a long trial, putting on a case, presenting evidence and doing everything else necessary to win a legal battle
When a case is taken to court, there is always a chance (however small) that the plaintiff will lose the case and will thus receive nothing. If a plaintiff has a settlement offer that guarantees him some type of compensation, he may be reluctant to give that up to take a chance.
All of these reasons help to explain why it is sometimes best for both parties to settle, provided that they can agree on reasonable settlement terms.
Tell us a little about your injury & get a local injury lawyer to review your case for Free.