Talk to a Lawyer
Enter a zip code to speak to a Lawyer that serves your area.

Select the type of Lawyer you need
Slander Defamation Lawsuit
Defamation and libel are defined as a false statement that injures someone's reputation and exposes them to public contempt, hatred, ridicule or condemnation. If the false statement is published in print or through broadcast media, such as radio or TV, it is called libel. If it is only spoken, it is called slander. You often hear "Truth is the perfect defense against libel." This is a curious notion, not entirely supported by what goes on in the courts. Truth is a very good defense. It may prove an unshakable defense if you have unlimited funds to pay lawyers to defend it. If you don't you should build a better defense and or offense when filing a slander lawsuit or any other lawsuit for defamation damages.
Common types of defamatory statements are the following:
- Statements which make a claim about whether a person has committed a crime.
- Statements which impute the presence of an infectious or loathsome disease.
- Statements which injure a person with respect to his office, trade or business.
- Statements which impute some lack of moral dignity.
What is Defamation?
Defamation is defined as an untrue statement which causes you to be held in contempt or ridicule and as a result causes you damages. Libel is a defamatory statement made in writing and slander is one made orally. If anyone has said anything that was offensive to you, you may have wondered if that person was guilty of having defamed you. Even if the statements fit into one of these categories, which are not all inclusive, it is not defamatory if it is true. Truth is an absolute defense in defamation cases. There are also other defenses in a defamation lawsuit. A particular statement may be privileged in that the law allows certain statements to be made without them being classified as defamatory. For example, statements made by certain public officers during the performance of their official duties are privileges.
Defamatory Statements Explained
A defamatory statement may either be a false writing, a picture or visual representation which exposes you to contempt, hatred, or ridicule, causes you to be shunned or avoided, or tends to injure you in you occupation. A slanderous defamatory statement would be one which was false but made through oral communication by word of mouth, radio or television. Certain other communications may be privileged, but there are too many rules regarding privileges and they are too complex to be stated in the short length of this message. False statements which are made maliciously, in other words, those generated with the state of mind arising from ill-will or hatred, are more often to be held by the courts to be defamatory than false statements which are not malicious (such as simple jokes or something of that nature).
However, if the statement is true, there is still no defamation, regardless of what the person’s state of mind was at the time. The defamation case is a difficult kind of lawsuit to win. The first amendment to the United States Constitution protects freedom of speech and the courts have set forth a complicated set of rules that are used to determine whether particular types of statements are protected by the first amendment, regardless of whether they are false. An experienced attorney can help you with any particular case.
- If you are considering filing a Personal Injury Claim, Submit your Case for a Free Review from a Personal Injury Lawyer in your area. This website is for informational purposes only, and nothing stated here should be taken as legal advice.
Content Related to Topic
- The Lead Lawyers In The Massive Stringfellow Toxic Tort Litigation In Riverside
Civil Litigation, Including Insurance And Environmental Cases, And Was One Of The Lead Lawyers In The Massive Stringfellow Toxic Tort Litigation In Riverside
- Increases Chances Of (Pro Se), But 20% Said They Could Afford A Tort Lawyer
To Have Lower Income $50,000 Or Less In Income Substantially Increases Chances Of (Pro Se), But 20% Said They Could Afford A Tort Lawyer
